Why don't we take 15% from the curator's 50% and give it to folks that don't curate but want rewards any way?
If we wanted to really get wild, we could take 50% of what is going to the dao, and give that to investors, too?
Just so we are clear where I stand, a hive earned without working comes from the rewards of all who did work, but didn't get their pay.
Either play the game, or wtf do you want?
If we were really concerned with getting small amounts into more hands, the top 70 accounts could idle their stake and let the rest of us give to others that don't have any hive, either.
Instead we are talking about giving those that have the most more?
Smdh.
This is why folks don't buy in, who does that?
Mark me down as thinking that we should set a max influence (currently 500mv, imo) that benefits growth, and anybody with stake in excess of that max can sell or hold, as they see fit.
Locking capital away is doing something. People get paid to lock up capital or they won't lock it up. The "game" can still be played, more profitably then simply locking your funds up for passive interest.
The idea here is, large investors may not want to be forced to play the game. However, they maybe willing to lock up funds to passive income, which helps the Hive ecosystem and price by reducing circulating supply. The goal here is to give those that play the game well an opp to gain more vs those that sit back passively. However, curation is always a risk and you may earn LESS than the ones earning passive.
But I am in agreement with those anti universal reward pool in that we shouldn't force investors to play the game or get diluted. I simply want to find a way to appease both sides, which I believe there is a middle ground we can use here.
The reason dilution in a governance token is so important as you not only lose out via inflation, but that also means you get diluted of your influence on the platform. This is key, gov tokens are no joke, that is the backbone security of our system. Someone like myself takes governance very seriously and is the reason I purchased and powered up as much as I have, is so I can help protect the network. Dilution is a real issue and investors should not be put in weird spots where they may get diluted.