We have discrepancies between data and theory for various measurements related to top quark physics.
Those discrepancies can potentially be explained by toponium effects....
Yes, your answer is clear and straightforward, but why did you choose the words potentially with respect to the toponium effects explaining the discrepancies between data and theory for various measurements related to top quark physics? Of course, I know that you wrote in your blog that it was not time to open the champagne bottle yet.
Toponium could explain what we have seen. This is what we have shown in our article.
To conclude about that fact, we need more precise theory predictions, as we only did back-of-the-envelope calculations. We are currently busy with those more precision computations, but they take time.
This is the reason why I used the word potentially (maybe there is something else hidden in data ;) ).
Thank you for the clarification sir.