Religion is entirely devoted to the contemplation of moral and aesthetic qualities
By making this the foundation of your argument, it immediately invalidates all that follows as it is flawed. I find nothing more in religion than simple power and control. Both morality and aesthetic qualities are subjective and the fact that part of these 'qualities' are universally accepted does not indicate they were defined by religion.
Great writing and very interesting articles.
I agree that it may invalidates some of the following statements and it is flawed when saying this argument. It is the flaws that makes the contradiction between science and religion beautiful. Religions anchors to morality which is subjected while science can be objective through scientific method. However, I see religion and science can be both subjected specifically when we are interpreting events and occurrences in nature. As you have mentioned, part of these "qualities" does not depicts a context from religion. I definitely agree with that, but a handful of these "qualities" are influenced greatly by religion. !PIZZA
@nathen007.stem! I sent you a slice of $PIZZA on behalf of @juecoree.
Learn more about $PIZZA Token at hive.pizza (3/10)