I just listened to the first one today. I have listened to one of Knobbe's talks before and was thinking he was a bit of an easy target, because his conclusions are all drawn from epidemiological research, which has it's place as a starting point for theories, but is of course full of holes. Gil was actually very respectful of him, however, which I respect in these kinds of discussions. I like that he even said that if people want to avoid seed oils it's not going to harm them.
It's given me some better ideas of what to search for to try and find something on the studies mentioned. I'm just hoping that the saturated fat arm of the studies weren't them eating junk food, which can sometimes be the case. Most people want to prove their hypothesis right whichever side of the argument they're on. Egos are hard to override.
Anyway, I enjoyed listening to him, he's calm and reasonable.
Gil is pretty good and I'm glad that he doesn't get personal because that would just undermine his authority. I think he could've done a better job providing evidence against what Knobbe said.
Knobbe wasn't always using epidemiological research, which has been denigrated a lot by influencers as being invalid science when a great deal of science is based on what is found with epidemiology, especially in cases where actual experimentation would be unethical; I wouldn't dismiss it. Some of the things that Knobbe said were sheer ignorance, non-sequiturs and other false logic, and that makes him either an ignorant fool or a shill. I can imagine that, even though he's a doctor, he may not have the skills and intelligences necessary to correctly understand data.
I'm glad the video has helped to point you in the right direction.