I agree that it may invalidates some of the following statements and it is flawed when saying this argument. It is the flaws that makes the contradiction between science and religion beautiful. Religions anchors to morality which is subjected while science can be objective through scientific method. However, I see religion and science can be both subjected specifically when we are interpreting events and occurrences in nature. As you have mentioned, part of these "qualities" does not depicts a context from religion. I definitely agree with that, but a handful of these "qualities" are influenced greatly by religion. !PIZZA