You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Science meet Religion: When does it intersect and contradict?

in StemSocial • 3 years ago

Dear @juecoree, When you say science and religion, do you mean European science and religion?
At present, I remember that East and Southeast Asia, Islam, and Africa have not yet made their own scientific histories and ideas.
I know only a little of the European science created by the Roman Catholic Church after the European Renaissance.

In fact, East Asia and Southeast Asia have not yet created their own scientific ideas.

From my point of view, you must first explain the history of science in Europe, created by Roman Catholicism in the 13th century, and the process of creation and development of ideas so that I can understand your arguments!😄

3 years ago in StemSocial by
$0.00
    Reply 3
    Sort:  
  • Trending
    • [-]
     3 years ago  

    When you say science and religion, do you mean European science and religion?

    Not specific to any groups. It is more general discourse.

    At present, I remember that East and Southeast Asia, Islam, and Africa have not yet made their own scientific histories and ideas. I know only a little of the European science created by the Roman Catholic Church after the European Renaissance. In fact, East Asia and Southeast Asia have not yet created their own scientific ideas.

    Yes, majority of science started from Europe during renaissance. I think East Asia and Southeast Asia has their own scientific ideas but not widely influential as compared to the Europeans and American.

    From my point of view, you must first explain the history of science in Europe, created by Roman Catholicism in the 13th century, and the process of creation and development of ideas so that I can understand your arguments!

    Possibly for another blog. This one is more on a free discourse on the general contradiction of Religion and Science. !PIZZA

    [-]
     3 years ago  
    Connect

    Trade


    @goldgrifin007! I sent you a slice of $PIZZA on behalf of @juecoree.

    Learn more about $PIZZA Token at hive.pizza (5/10)

    $0.00
      Reply
      [-]
       3 years ago  

      Not specific to any groups. It is more general discourse.

      Yes, majority of science started from Europe during renaissance. I think East Asia and Southeast Asia has their own scientific ideas but not widely influential as compared to the Europeans and American.

      Dear @juecoree, your point of view is great However, from my point of view, I think that East and Southeast Asia have not yet completed their own scientific ideas, methods of thought, and views of history.

      Science and Civilisation in China (1954–present) is an ongoing series of books about the history of science and technology in China published by Cambridge University Press. It was initiated and edited by British historian Joseph Needham (1900–1995). Needham was a well-respected scientist before undertaking this encyclopedia and was even responsible for the "S" in UNESCO.[1] To date there have been seven volumes in twenty-seven books. The series was on the Modern Library Board's 100 Best Nonfiction books of the 20th century.[2] Needham's work was the first of its kind to praise Chinese scientific contributions and provide their history and connection to global knowledge in contrast to eurocentric historiography.[3]

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Science_and_Civilisation_in_China

      Most modern Korean and Chinese scientists are studying the history of East Asian science by studying the writings of British historian Joseph Needham (1900–1995).

      The reason is that East Asian science has not yet reached the level of European science! 😄

      Currently, in East Asian science, the realms of science, religion, and philosophy have not been separated!

      Has Southeast Asian science not yet created its own scholasticism?

      $0.00
        Reply