@logic, i believe this was an issue of quotes not well referenced and not as you making it seem to be. Yes the article may not have been well referenced but is not the same as the issue you are pointing to please.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
The article ie evident plagiarism. Vast majority of is plainly rewritten by changing the structure of sentences a little bit.
Yes that is true, but the old reference you made was quotes and not an article, thank you