But surely nobody is stupid enough to base their curation strategies on that single scale?
My argument exactly. Some arguments suggest so - but most of us would look at the bigger picture.
I like the forensic analogy. It's easy to say... Yeah, he did it, based on one piece of evidence, but it's important to see it from many angles, right?
Yes, that is right.
When you wrote:
I thought, "well I completely ignored it!" Then I realised that I was not right. Which prompted me to remember that long-remembered analogy. And just now, I noticed your emphasis on 'completely'. So let's hope that the proponents of the KE ratio will use it as a guiding light towards further research. Not as a harsh rule to punish good people.
Finally, I forgot to thank you for the post. It was a great read. Right from the heart ♥️
Yeah that's crazy absolutist. That's exactly what I'm against. You can't blindly look at one thing, right?
I mean, sucking rewards and giving nothing back is BOTH a poor KE AND a poor HM (HEART METRIC)....THATS the kind of Hiver that shouldn't be blindly voted.
But you can have a poor KE and a high HM. That's more important, IMO.