The consumers will decide whether your stuff applies to those adjectives.

Yep, obviously. But the only way those consumers can be able to decide whether or not your stuff applies to those adjectives, is that they all have to be true readers too. There is no other way for them to do it even if they are clairvoyants.

There are ways to get into a trending page, just not the mainstream trending page but at least anyone can get into trending. From observation, mass tagging everyone and picking fights can get your blog on trending, just not a positive trending list.

I get the impression that you may be confusing two different concepts here.

It's one thing to have a trending page on a platform where eventually someone potentially might see one of your posts highlighted there if it previously gets enough support, upvotes and rewards. And quite another that your blog manages to reach any alternative trending list (indistinctly positive or negative) without the general and organic consensus of that same support, upvotes and rewards which you usually only get in your publications.

Hmmm, interesting way to describe an audience.

Elementary my dear @adamada! :)

It is more than evident that we all write and create content for a specific audience.

If I had more time to gather data, a stat program, and know how to make sense of that data, there are plenty of stuff I'm curious about on the blockchain relating to human behavior. :>

Nah dear! blockchain relating to human behavior works exactly the same in real life, the metaverse, the virtual and digital world and in any galaxy, universe and dimension or wherever you want to put them while they still keep being humans. Don't waste your time searching, downloading and crunching numbers or data in any statistical software. :)