It's just my observations, those who feel they spam-reblog will adjust their own behaviour, or not. I think it's clear that most people hate it, no matter what reasons people give for it.
I don't agree that it gets more eyes on those posts. People ignore them, and will begin to ignore the user spam-reblogging them also. Eventually.
I don't see how there's any benefits to spam-reblogging.
I see and understand your point of view, but did you never see an interesting reblog and thought, oh nice, this one I havent seen?
It would be a good thing someone could turn off the visibility of reblogs. In blurt they have this function.
So, now I have to look out for WE topic :-)
I have yes...I just don't like people spamming them onto my feed, like many in a row. You don't have to agree, I didn't write this post for people to agree with me, just share their opinion.
In my opinion, people spam-reblogging will lose followers and support. If they are ok with that, and feel they'd rather help random shit-posters, that's totally fine by me. It's a free blockchain.
(Blurt is fucken terrible, there's nothing good over there. Hive rejects.)
I was happy to hear your opinion because it was somthing I never thought about :-)
Thank you for saying it.
We're all a bunch of strangers just making our way a long. I have opinions, as do others, and I believe it's ok to voice them. Not everyone will agree and some may take offense - That's how freedom of speech works.