I'm glad you sent me this post, I was unaware of this and I agree, it's better to prioritise quality and know that reblogging, choosing carefully is the best thing to do.
Now I understand why I look at many who do not reblog, I did not know.
I thank you for this learning I did today, and I agree.
What prompted me was that you just reblogged two OCD posts in a row, and I wondered why you would do that. You have your reasons I guess and that's ok. I'm not even saying, don't reblog, only that I unfollow those who do it excessively. I like to leave them a message letting them know too, hence my message to you.
If you see something that you see has value for others then maybe give it a reblog, but doing it so often can be seen as more annoying than anything else. Most of who you have reblogged lately I've muted so I'll not see them and they have no chance of getting a vote from me...so, it's had the opposite effect than that which you wanted I guess. Too bad for them.
I fully understand, I did not know about this issue. I had not thought about that point of view. Now I know a little more and will continue to improve.
If in the case of ocd, I mistaken the post and then do not remove the older one.
Thank you very much for letting me know and if it is true one post a day is enough. I will do it that way from now on.
Thank you very much again.
Focus on quality. I am happy to support good work and if I know a person only reblogs occasionally and focuses on quality, then I'm more likely to open the reblogged post and possibly vote it a d send it to curangel.
Ohhh now I understand, perfect I will, quality above all things.
Thanks for telling me about these things because I didn't know about them, ok I will focus on good publications.
Happy to know a little more and I'm focused on improving myself too, that's why I'm going to buy a camera very soon, that's what drives me to more.
Best regards Galenkp.