Hi folks! I hope you're all doing really well. Before I ask for your critiques, I figure a little background information on my photographic experience might be useful, so here goes..!
I'm a teacher and this year, for the first time, I've been given a photography class to teach. Which is great. Except, I don't really know anything about photography. Well, at least, up until a few weeks ago, I didn't know anything about photography.
Now, by nothing, I mean that I'm aware that cameras exist, and I've been carrying one around in my pocket for quite a while now. I do own a DSLR, but only a very entry-level one, a Canon 1100D, that has spent a lot of it's time, in my possession, keeping a bench in my closet warm. On the rare occasion this camera made its way into my hands, the only mode I ever used was auto, figuring that the manual settings were reserved primarily for professionals who had been studying photography for years. Happily, in the past few weeks, I have discovered the error in my thinking.
Up until now, when I've needed a moment in time captured for as long as I don't delete it, I've reached for my phone, pointed it at the subject and pressed the shutter control button to capture the image. Which is fine, but as a teacher, I need to make sure that my students are reaching a higher level of understanding, so over the past few weeks, I have delved into the theory (and some limited practice) of using the manual controls on a camera.
My primary focus has been on understanding exposure and using ISO, aperture and shutter speed to control the amount of light that hits the sensor. I've also been researching composition and some basic editing principles. The course I'm teaching is entry level, so I don't think I'll be making it too complex. Exposure, composition and basic editing are likely as difficult as I'll make the theoretical aspects, and then just a lot of practice at perfecting these concepts.
I'm happy to be able to say that I've thoroughly loved learning how to use the manual settings of a camera, and regardless of whether I ever get to teach it again, I think I've found a hobby that I'll be continuing on with well into the future. Long exposure and macro photography are particularly enticing styles, and I can see why so many people around the world are interested in pursuing pohotgraphy.
Anyway, that's probably enough preamble! What I'm hoping you can do for me is to now have a look at the two images below and critique them to death. It's the same image from my first attempt at melding exposure and composition. The top image is the unedited version and the second includes my attempt at editing where I've tried my hand at changing the white balance and a few other settings as well as adding in a very small vignette.
Any feedback you can give will be much appreciated, particularly around my use of the following:
- The settings used;
- The nature of the exposure;
- The composition of the shot, and/or
- The editing.
I know that this is very subjective, and that opinions may vary, but I'm happy for any professional discussion that might help me to become better at photography so that I can more effectively teach the students who take the course this year.
The camera used was the aforementioned Canon 1100D with the kit lens (18-55mm no IS) with the following settings: ISO 800, f/5.6, 1/4000.
Thanks, in advance, to anyone who can offer any insight into any improvements that can be considered .
I would describe myself as a hobby photographer at best @mattclarke, and I would agree that macro and long-exposure are enjoyable to take.
My primary thoughts for you are on composition and focus. There is quite a lot of grass to look at, and while I feel I should be drawn towards the dead grass amongst the green, just because there is lots to look at, I'm having trouble finding a focal point focus on.
I'd normally try for a subject that I can have some depth between it and its background:
Or, with a contrast difference between subject and surroundings (not the best pick-up of the colour, but as example):
As for the focus, were you using a single focal point (such as a macro mode) and were you manually focussing on the particular point you were after? This is taken with a macro lense, but it shows how the focus can be used:
Though I'm sure @holoz0r has something more profound to say then these ramblings 😂 I'm not very fancy with my camera use, but I take plenty of photos that some come out good :)
Thanks for your feedback, @kiokizz - it's handy to get some ideas about better craft before I take it to the classroom.
I wasn't really worrying about focal point and composition when I took this one. I did try and frame it as nicely as possible, but I wasn't thinking about any compositional strategies when I took it. Mainly, I was seeing if I could get some depth of field using the f-stop and making sure that I was manipulating the exposure triangle well enough that the image would expose well.
I appreciate you including some of your images as well. I see what you're saying in regard to having more of a stand out subject in the image. It does help in determining where to look when viewing the photo.
I've been tested, and can successfully identify a photo on 7 out of every 10 attempts.
Should he tokenise this relevation on lensy.io or delete this post, sell his camera, and donate the money to the blind (they were spared seeing it; but they might have had it described to them.) @kiokizz @holoz0r, @shaidon
I am not a professional photographer, but I would recommend talking to the others for expert advice.
Congratulations @steveblucher! You have completed the following achievement on the Hive blockchain and have been rewarded with new badge(s):
Your next target is to reach 15000 upvotes.
You can view your badges on your board and compare yourself to others in the Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word
STOP
Check out the last post from @hivebuzz:
Support the HiveBuzz project. Vote for our proposal!
Keep on keeping on