considering that god is a genderless entity (the one spirit) then HE does not exit. it exists but why not using it instead of HE.
that is a clue that you believe in god.
though one must believe that forbidding an act, drink or food is reasonable.
Posted via D.Buzz
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Yup!
That's one of the weak-points of my statement, I believe someone who doesn't will frame their words differently.
To be fair, that buzz was more for me. It's a question I keep asking myself trying to find if my answer changed.
Posted via D.Buzz
English is not my native language so I might be wrong, but from what I learned "He" can be used for genderless entities, because "it" refers to beings that don't have personality... It also has lower-than-human-feel to it compared to he/she/them.
Posted via D.Buzz
In the fringe Christian sect I grew up in, God was literally male. In other sects the choice of "he" is cos God the father's relationship with us is easier to understand as patriarchal rather than matriarchal. More progressive Christian sects also use "she".
Posted via D.Buzz
Well, I have never heard of a Christian referring to God with (she). But I know that God of Ibrahim is a male entity.
Yahwa and Allah both referred to their identity as (we) and a singular male only.
.
I was just asking the author, to get to know his way of thinking regarding the existence.
The Christians I have sometimes heard referring to God as she were progressive Anglicans, though there are also others from sects I did not identify.
I'm interested in this topic too, I hope you don't mind me joining in.
!ENGAGE !LUV
I have never heard any Christian referring to God as she.
I find this interesting too.
Studying religions alongside myths has always been a thing that I am passionate about.
Have A !PIZZA
@eturnerx-dbuzz! I sent you a slice of $PIZZA on behalf of @tazyexlos.
Learn more about $PIZZA Token at hive.pizza (1/10)
@tazyexlos, you were given LUV from @eturnerx-dbuzz. About LUV: https://peakd.com/@luvshares