Users following your decentralized blacklist does not prevent the farmers from still posting for unfair rewards. 🤨
Posted via D.Buzz
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Users following your decentralized blacklist does not prevent the farmers from still posting for unfair rewards. 🤨
Posted via D.Buzz
Only solution would be implementing an actual reputation posting requirement, or censoring/banning them specifically from the platform, or an 'opt out' blacklist for DBuzz that'd interfere with them opting out themselves.
It unfortunately comes with the territory of censor free.
Posted via D.Buzz
I think the best solution right now that does not promote centralized censorship is for the users to use their Downvote Power where appropriate (like for reward farming in this case). 🤔
@chrisrice
Lol, I just imagined a 'suspected spam/farming' section of the website utilizing a list, then the community can go in, with the light being shined on them there, and downvote them.
Posted via D.Buzz
While that is not censorship by itself, it encourages people to downvote everyone on the list. However, it is indeed not appropriate unless the list is 100% accurate. 🤔
Posted via D.BuzzOffering appeals should be fine. @Chrisrice would surely ensure appeals are done on the chain and not discord.
Definitely.
Posted via D.BuzzBut I think a better response is transparent decentralized mutelists, followed by downvotes, and an announcement section on @dbuzz w/a free market of Mutelists
Posted via D.Buzz@savvyplayer ☝️
It will decrease the visibility of their rewards, on an opt-in basis.
Downvotes will fix the rest.
Posted via D.Buzz