I hope you don't mind me asking more questions. I like to try understand where people are coming from. Consider if Alice, Bob and Charlie each own 1 hectare of land and this is their land usage:
Alice produced 1,000kg of apples, Bob did 1,00 hours of chartered accounting work and Charlie hunted 100kg of wild game meat. How would you compare productivity?
Excluding land fertility and other factors. I see that Alice was the most productive here. Producing a ton of apple. Regarding Bob a Charlie. Charlie had only a one boar hunt. Or that might a year of hunting birds.
There must be factors such as the time framework of production. And an ideal / average productivity estimation for each. Remember. It needs to be fair and righteous
Bob did the most work by hours. So how do we make that fair?
why! how many working hours would it take to produce a ton of apples! that would take a year of farming I believe!
talking about bob is that a 100 (hundred) or a typo (1000)
..
the point is that there must be a reference for productivity/effort/working hours/impact on society
Posted via D.Buzz
A year of watching the trees do the work then some hours of picking. Do we know if Alice spent time maintaining the land and trees so that the apple harvests can continue for decades?