I totally disagree with almost 100% of what you say here.

In the first half, they play badly and had just one chance which was converted

And then you contradict yourself with the double standard by saying Liverpool didn't deserve to win because they played badly in the second half and spurs deserved to win.....what about the fact that spurs played so bad in the first half and yet got the goal..? Why is it any different to liverpool "playing bad" in the second half and getting a goal?

They had the most clear cut chances in the game and could have won this game with a 2-3 goal margin if all chances were converted.

This is no logic for a team to win! "IF" they scored they would win.....well "IF" Liverpool scored all the chances they had in the first half they'd win by 3-4 goals too. "IF."

Finally, how can you say the team who had only 2-3 shots on target deserved to win more than the team who had 11? "That's how they play" is not an explanation....if "that's how they play," then they actually deserve to lose.

Having said that, I do not think Tottenham or Liverpool played bad, it was entertaining game in all honesty and both team had chances to win the game. Liverpool took their chances, tottenham didn't. It's as simple as that.

Even the Liverpool team knew they didn't deserve the win and that was why the goal which won the match was celebrated with much pleasure.

I am sorry, but this is stupid and I have read some of you posts previously and thought you understood football well. I am disappointed I must say. If you think a team celebrates wildly because they think they didn't deserve to win....well.....not much left to say here.