Thank you very much for such a warm welcome @storiesoferne!
I really appreciate your comments because I know you are a great expert on architecture and design. I have read some of your posts and they are excellent both from the analysis point of view and from the visual point of view of each of the works you choose.
In my case, I must be honest in saying that my scant approach to architecture was as a planner at the drawing table with the T-ruler and rapidgraphs. And in the design of some other area of ​​my apartment.🙂

Regarding your question, I must say that from the Bridge Over the Lake I admire the area of ​​the bridge that becomes a cable-stayed type. It has always seemed to me that bridges that have this type of design are really pieces of art that are combined with architecture and engineering. In other words, in order to successfully complete these bridges, creativity had to be appealed to rather than the scientific part of the exact combination of its components. When engineers and architects face a project that goes beyond normal construction standards, the element of creativity and innovation becomes the bundle up their sleeve and from where in the end the best results are obtained. If we look at the photo that shows the bridge in the distance, we can notice that the cables form a certain angle similar to that of a scale and I suppose that it is in this way that each small section of the bridge in the middle of the lake is kept in total stability. For me, it is one of the most admirable aspects.

Thanks again, I greatly appreciate your comments and for taking the time to read my post.