greetings @acidyo,
in one of the comments left on my article it is clearly specified by the user @pfunk
"My downvote means nothing personal about you or your post. You've done nothing wrong."
I understand the differences you may have with @crypto.piotr , but you should address them with him and not censor those who do nothing wrong, our accounts are small and we work to bring food to our families a negative vote hurts us, finally if we decided to be content creators on @project.hope , it is because of @crypto.piotr For us he is a great person with a human quality that you don't find everywhere.
It's not censorship and my issue with your leader has nothing to do with this, obviously it doesn't help as I know his intentions but it would be the same no matter who's behind this scheme.
It's fascinating watching the actual brainwashing take place and set in. The way this post is framed and the included disinformation. Then the enforcers step in to apply the disinformation:
So these other folks in the community who are directed to not speak to anyone, ask questions, or even think critically see this and think, "Oh it must be true. There's one my peers who I look up to struggling with this."
It's all one big show.
you are absolutely right "my problem with your leader has nothing to do with it", we have nothing to do with it but you are using your account to destroy the weaker ones who "have nothing to do with it", my question is if my account had 2000000 hp would you also try to censor it, you do this because you know we can't defend ourselves but by exposing our truth.
Any account attempting to cheat the EIP, proof of brain and our current fair curation I'd attempt to downvote as well, yes. Look at my posts from 2020 if you want to see proof of the retaliation I received doing exactly that after the EIP.
my question, where is the deception? you accuse me of receiving upvotes (as if that is a crime) and set up a theory based on the fact that I sold my article (without knowing the reasons for my support of the PH community) and then without verifying anything, you run a campaign against small accounts that cannot defend themselves, what you do my dear friend is called "censorship" your only purpose is to make the accounts that can't defend themselves afraid of you, I live in a country full of people with power who censor those who can't defend themselves and abuse their power that's why I understand very well people who say one thing but do another.
reflect on your actions and the consequences for those who have nothing to do with it, do not use us to try to harm the creator of the community because it only affects families with very difficult lives, for you it is a simple negative vote, for us it is the food for the day or medicine for a family member suffering from the virus.
"I repeat, we have nothing to do with your personal war, if you have something against the community, talk to its creator".
By setting your posts at some percent beneficiary to @ph-fund, you participated in the vote buying/self-voting scheme. So I exercised my stake in Hive to disagree with that allocation of the posting reward pool.
I would not downvote your posts otherwise. Just like this exploitive scheme wouldn't upvote your posts unless you pledged some % of the rewards to them, as can be seen by the posts that don't do that.
"By setting your posts at some percent beneficiary to @ph-fund, you participated in the vote buying/self-voting scheme."
if what you say is true, can you explain why this article that does not have the % set to ph, received positive votes (Master mind)
Which other vote buying/self-voting scheme will accuse me in this case?
what you do is called censorship and the only purpose is to harm the creator of the community because of a personal war you have, for you the small accounts are only means with which you hope to reach an end (that only you know), or at least that's what your actions show..
Finally, while you from the comfort of your homes hurt people who have nothing to do with your private wars, we will continue to stand firm in our support of the community, as doing so does not imply that we are breaking any rules. set a% of our articles for a user or a community. "We don't do it to get favours from anyone", we do it because we want to support that community or user.
It's no coincidence that post wasn't upvoted by PH accounts, because you didn't set it to pay 50% to ph-fund. That's the heart of the matter. I wouldn't have downvoted that post and I haven't been downvoting posts that aren't paying ph-fund a cut.
The rest of your comment is nonsense. Piotr is a crook but I didn't downvote the PH community's posts until I learned of this scheme. And I'm not trying to take the posts to zero either. As a stakeholder in Hive, you're welcome for the rewards you've been earning from the inflation of my own stake. I realize if you don't understand how Hive works, it's easy to be ungrateful. But the glass-half-empty attitude is not really the way to look at it.