Why has hive kept Rewards Payout as 50% HBD & 50% HP or 100%HP?
Why don't we have all the payout in HBD only, hive could have let individuals decide whether to convert it into HP or not?
Why is hive locking the rewards as HP, let individual decide if he want to invest back in HP?
Moreover, hive made it mandatory to lock minimum 50% HP.
Should I call it a wicked scheme?
@acidyo, you are doing great work with what you are doing with curating communities. I appreciate that.
You must also try to understand it from the perspective of a PH community member.
No one has tricked me. I am an adult and can think. Large hive power doesn't necessarily make anyone more smarter.
Today you have a large hive power and you are downvoting our posts by interpreting what we might be doing and that is just an interpretation not reality.
Thanks
Your question is really unrelated to this.
You could instead ask, why is no one selling votes anymore? They could easily sell their votes for some extra returns, right? Or instead of selling just ask the people they gonna upvote to give them a small percentage in beneficiaries, right?
Why was the EIP introduced with 25% downvote mana? Why did vote selling stop as a majority to exist right after that? Who tried their best to disincentivize vote selling to make curation as fair and trending as unique and deserving of the rewards based on the content and who was behind it rather than who was buying votes or bribing curators?
I didn't stop my attempts back then to improve curation and proof of brain, even when I had South Korean stakeholders with 50m+ SP who were equally as much against downvotes stop me and I sure won't stop now from someone who has one of the worst reputations on Hive pulling this scheme in exchange for higher returns and an unfair growth compared to the rest of the platform. It's surprising it even lasted this long, guess people are just busy with their own things. And I will try my best to keep proof of brain and curation for the sake of content after the next hardfork that'll make curation curve linear again.
I've repeated myself enough now for a week and won't be discussing this matter further, at least not against the same hivemind and same arguments over and over.
Thanks , will not discuss further, your are only talking about vote-selling, which is not the case here.
Or, it could be...
Setting a small percentage voluntarily for the growth of community.
I see it that way...you see it other way around!
Perception.
The same perception that thinks piotr is doing it all for the good of the community but never mentioning his own returns and the growth of the accounts directly benefitting him the most, i.e. the selfishness of it all compared to just paying the leases from his own pocket or giving delegators higher than 100% returns from his own costs if it really was about community growth. Keep sheeping.
A slight difference in interpretation can change the whole meaning.