What's your opinion about posts upvoted by pH fund that's is plagiarised? You seem to be inept at sanctioning a user that have been caught plagiarising within your community. Even tipu is being use to compound those gains for ph fund.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
On a daily basis, our anti-plagiarism team reviews the posts that are published within PH.
Sometimes we must silence many of these posts for various reasons, including plagiarism.
Perhaps you could enlighten us with your vast wisdom to do our work better and thus stop being inept.
https://peakd.com/@jessica999/what-to-consider-when-starting-a-business
Lacks interaction from the comment section, basically a profile that talks about a topic they have no mastery, content churned out spells that they just copy snippets off the Internet.
This isn't an isolated case. Not that you are responsible to what your community members does all the time but showing you are capable of sanctioning users that do crap on your turf shows effective moderation.
There have been responses on the post and @crypto.piotr can't seem to be bothered to comment on it even if his vote was in on it.
You're not curating for quality posts but using posts as a front to give people some pats in the back for trying their best. Which is fine in noble intentions but also a big slap to other creators on the platform that actually put in the work researching, having actual expertise on the subject and aren't giving generic content taken bits from Google searches.
I would drop some posts I find fitting the category but I already reached a threshold to how often I could be mean, for now anyway.