Hello, welcome! Accidentally voted this too high. 😅
Seeing as you've created a lot of quality content for the short time you've been on Hive which many haven't been curated I'll leave this vote be but be aware others may downvote it to adjust rewards. Don't be too alarmed by this as that's how Hive works, hope you enjoy your stay here!
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Hello, what a surprised to wake up for. Just get up to drink some water and saw this. Either way either way, we appreciate that you always keep an eye on us and thank you for your hard working toward the community.
What a nice mistake by @ocdb to wake up to. I always say and believe that things happen for a reason😀
Anyways. Welcome both of you to this awesome community. You will love it here and we are happy to have you here with us.
Thanks for your kind words, we'll hope you stay tuned because more of our adventures are coming.
It's been a long while since I've seen a post with such rewards. At first I thought I'm not seeing right since I just woke up 🤣
Yeah same here. And thank you for following our journey, I'm looking forward to see yours too.
Riiiiiiiight... coming from the team that bitches a lot about excessive rewards! You're aware you can unvote and revote, don't you?
Well I was hoping people would use their downvotes instead, but some decided to cast more votes which maybe shows some of the problems we have with blind curation and why downvotes need to be used more.
Also the comment was sending rewards to hive.fund but good thing you downvoted it down so new people wouldn't know what was happening.
Why would you hope people would downvote and lose you curation when you could just unvote and revote? That doesn't seem to make much sense.
Cause the latter loses ocdb all curation rewards?
I don't think we should discourage manual votes even more, some accidents happen sometimes we're all human. Downvoting wouldn't null all returns.
So you care more about your own curation rewards, than doing the right thing, got it.
If you had a few brain cells left you could easily compare how low ocdb's apr is on hivestats compared to others meaning we don't usually care about that and often vote on posts after 24h as well if they're underrewarded. Not to mention how little of ocdb's rewards go to me.
Doesn't matter, ocdb still made a big mistake and refuse to correct it. Your delegations should be revoked.
Ya... OCDB's curation APR is really low compared to others...
Hmmm...
Source: Top Hive Earners By Category | Authors, Curators, Witnesses, DAO | December 2021
^^ Have you been going through those posts @logiczombie?
if you revoted with the stake that was unvoted then you would get curation from the new vote.. or does the system not return your vote power when a vote is undone? it's been a while since i looked at how that works.
Almost no-one on Hive has the vote power to downvote a $600 upvote, so it's not really possible to undo the mistake with downvoting (without largescale organisation of lots of people for that purpose). I think 99% of people would just undo the vote.
lol you were literally crying about how much stake some people have and how that means hive is centralized a week ago but now barely anyone can downvote it down? Post has been on trending for a while now and aside from a couple snowflake attention whores no one seems to mind. It's a newcomer, let him/her enjoy the little RNG in curation. Not to mention one of the few ones who've actually bought hive and staked it up before posting.
Only about 5 accounts do large downvotes and only really yours has the power to downvote to this scale from what I've seen.
https://peakd.com/hive-167922/@acidyo/re-cmplxty-r4irln
Not only do you lose the curation returns from the vote you removed (and voting power) but the next vote won't give you any returns either (it all goes to the other voters on that post). Something already in talks to fix as many can't really recall what the purpose of it was to work this way to begin with, most likely anti-botting during the front-run reward era.
Fair enough, I do recall now from learning about this on Steem - I presumed it had something to do with putting people off of upvoting to get reach and then unvoting to use that reach somewhere else. Otherwise a post could be upvoted to the top spot, get a bunch of votes due to the exposure, then be unvoted and rinse-repeat - the same vote power boosts up a load of posts without ever actually being intended to result in a reward payout from the upvoter's own HP/stake.