Hello, friend @acydio
I think it's a good idea that you want us to do more promotion on Twitter, but I get the impression that this new system is very cumbersome.
We are on Discord because it simplifies the search for publications to vote for. If we have to get them directly on Hive, and that they meet all the requirements, we will have to use a lot of time.
I am an artist and it takes me at least 12 hours to create a post. Besides, I have another job that feeds me.
I also think that tweeting other articles from people who are not in OCD and are not interested in being in OCD, would subtract votes for those of us who are in OCD and do care about it.
For example, if after following the instructions correctly, I tweet 3 posts, and in addition, no one tweets mine, I would have no chance of being included in the curation.
On the other hand, the rush to look for interesting, recently published posts would lead us to choose, out of haste, any blog that may not be of quality.
We are all on Hive because we want Hive to grow, but also to be rewarded for our posts. Doing all that work for nothing would be frustrating.
I have long felt that the quality of posts on Hive has declined.
It seems to me that it would be more interesting if you would come up with a strategy to reward the best content according to clear standards and that would be people who are in OCD. This way, we would all be interested in improving our content: writings, images, structure, photos, videos, etc., and that, at the same time, would include the multiple publications of other people's posts on Twitter or other social networks.
That would be much, much better for Hive and for everyone.
I think you fail to understand that POSH Curation is only a small part of our curation initiatives. We still curate and look for new posts of newcomers, posts in niche communities that aren't in our incubation, posts in all niche communities that are, some random upvotes here and there provided by me and even on posts that are in no communities, etc.
If people don't tweet back some of your posts that are underrewarded and of quality then I suggest move on from them, but it shouldn't have to be a quid pro quo action always, you can also just feel good about doing some curation through us and helping get some posts of authors proper rewards through this initiative and maybe karma will eventually come your way. Not to mention that we do reward the comment of your @poshtoken tweet with some rewards as well as the "finder" and tweeter of the post that got curated. It could even be that we will only reward the tweet comment of yours if the post you shared was already overrewarded by the time we got to it, etc. So it's not really a complete "waste of time" in a monetary sense neither.
This part I don't really understand what you mean.
Maybe, this new way of doing things is a great idea and I don't see it.
I think it's a good idea that you want us to do more promotion on Twitter, but I get the impression that this new system is very cumbersome.
We are on Discord because it simplifies the search for publications to vote for. If we have to get them directly on Hive, and that they meet all the requirements, we will have to use a lot of time.
I am an artist and it takes me at least 12 hours to create a post. Besides, I have another job that feeds me.
I don't have a lot of time to do curation, although I do curate on my own, as I am primarily a quality content generator.
We'll see what happens over time.
I hope you understand me