If you had a few brain cells left you could easily compare how low ocdb's apr is on hivestats compared to others meaning we don't usually care about that and often vote on posts after 24h as well if they're underrewarded. Not to mention how little of ocdb's rewards go to me.
Is that what you say when you run out of arguments?
That seems to be the pattern.
King-Acid-Bot's most common response seems to be "Enjoy being irrelevant," but as long as it's an ad hominem or some name calling, or blanket lies, he's happy to throw 'em out there.
It's about 0.7% off of the 9.5% that curators are supposed to get AFAIK, maybe you've been too busy voting up declined reward posts for attention and yourself to get downvoted that your APR is that low. While we don't actively focus on maximizing APR and often vote on posts that are past 24h, etc, we still curate manually and attempt to not overreward users so that's probably why we still do okay.
Last I checked it was at 8.5 and others were higher when I placed that comment, not sure the reasons it's gone up lately but it's not something we look at often.
Anyway, people noticed this post and downvoted it and as discussed with @ura-soul re-voting is already something being discussed to be fixed so not really interested in wasting more time discussing this with irrelevant people.
If you had a few brain cells left you could easily compare how low ocdb's apr is on hivestats compared to others meaning we don't usually care about that and often vote on posts after 24h as well if they're underrewarded. Not to mention how little of ocdb's rewards go to me.
Doesn't matter, ocdb still made a big mistake and refuse to correct it. Your delegations should be revoked.
lol, sad little man.
Is that what you say when you run out of arguments?
That seems to be the pattern.
King-Acid-Bot's most common response seems to be "Enjoy being irrelevant," but as long as it's an ad hominem or some name calling, or blanket lies, he's happy to throw 'em out there.
Not my first rodeo with people like him.
I'm sure you all know deep down how worthless you are with what you do here.
It's pretty obvious what your motive is here so I'm going to stop wasting time on grudgy hasbeens.
Ya... OCDB's curation APR is really low compared to others...
It's about 0.7% off of the 9.5% that curators are supposed to get AFAIK, maybe you've been too busy voting up declined reward posts for attention and yourself to get downvoted that your APR is that low. While we don't actively focus on maximizing APR and often vote on posts that are past 24h, etc, we still curate manually and attempt to not overreward users so that's probably why we still do okay.
Didn't you forget this one, snake?
You didn't mention a "should be earning" - you said to compare it to others... and it earns a higher APR than most.
I've never been concerned with APR - because that is not one of the goals of @Abundance.Tribe
This conversation is about OCDB, and you claiming that it would have been a hit to your "already low" APR to remove your HUGE over-reward.
Didn't forget it, it's not a project that asks for or receives delegations from the community.
I can go find a bunch of other community curation accounts if you want...
Guarantee almost every single one earns a lower APR than OCDB does.
Last I checked it was at 8.5 and others were higher when I placed that comment, not sure the reasons it's gone up lately but it's not something we look at often.
Anyway, people noticed this post and downvoted it and as discussed with @ura-soul re-voting is already something being discussed to be fixed so not really interested in wasting more time discussing this with irrelevant people.
Hmmm...
Source: Top Hive Earners By Category | Authors, Curators, Witnesses, DAO | December 2021
^^ Have you been going through those posts @logiczombie?