You gals and guys do great work.
Question: Does looking into the history of staking/selling the hive/HBD earned weigh in to repeated votes?
I would think we would want to encourage those using hive and staking / curating themselves and engaging to take the highest priority?
Of course we're just human so saying we don't look at that at all and that it may not effect our decisions might be a lie, but we do try to curate according to effort, contributions in other ways (such as being active and engaging outside of just your own posts) and in general what kind of content you produce consistently and if there's a want for your content (if others enjoy commenting on your posts after having read them).
Judging someone based on their sells may come into effect if it's a long term trend, we all have needs and Hive can help a lot of people in need if they use it well. There should be plenty of investors and outside money coming in to take their Hive they may be selling, at the same time if they sell when prices are low or before another run up I'm sure they'll regret it more than we do. I like to think that judging people based only off of if they're selling or holding is kind of similar as judging posts based on where the author is from and what vote should be given depending on their average salaries in such a country. It feels wrong and weird, this platform is a great example of bridging those gaps where anyone from anywhere can get equal treatment and rewards based on their contributions and loyalty and activity to Hive.