I have always been interested in the myths surrounding lung cancer. As I began to read more, I realized that there was a lot more going on here than meets the eye. For instance, I used to think smoking was the only cause of lung cancer. Well, it turns out that isn't really so. Although a huge influencing factor, not necessarily. Genetic predisposition, pollution, and carcinogens also play key roles in its development.
I was really shocked to learn that lung cancer can be diagnosed irrespective of age. Yes, the risk surges with age, but the young ones can also be diagnosed with it, especially if they have an alarming family history or a previous exposure to some harmful substance. It just goes to show that lung cancer isn't an old critique, as so many people tend to think. It is necessary to do everything possible to raise awareness of the dangers and take some measures of precaution, whatever the age may be.
I have heard sometimes that people say, "There is no point in giving up smoking if you have already been smoking for years." On this statement, I totally disagree.
Quitting smoking can cut down considerably the risks of developing lung cancer, even if you've been a heavy smoker all your life. Your body starts to heal almost from day one of quitting, and with each year, the risk of developing lung cancer decreases. It's never too late to quit—something I think should really be emphasized everywhere.
Another myth that I would like to debunk is the inhalation of talcum powder causing lung cancer. I have come across many people who are really scared about this, but the truth is that there's no strong evidence linking talcum powder and lung cancer. The major risk factors remain smoking and carcinogens such as asbestos. What is important here is addressing the real risks and not being concerned about spurious arguments.
I have also met those who have a notion that antioxidant supplements may fight lung cancer. As much as antioxidants are basic requirements for a healthy life, no evidence shows that they will offer prevention or cure of lung cancer. Rather than depend on supplementation, I believe attention to a balanced diet dominated by fruits and vegetables should be the way in preventing this cancer.
The thing that really upsets me is the belief that lung cancer is always fatal. Well, it isn't true. Some lung cancers are quite aggressive in nature; on the other hand, if detected early, others might get cured after proper treatment.
Therefore, to be aware of the types of cancer and the related treatments seems quite vital to me, the major reasons for dispelling much fear and stigma associated with this disease.
I also happen to be very concerned about the rise of electronic cigarettes and the perception that they are a safe alternative to regular smoking. Of course, it is irrefutably true that there can be less harm from e-cigarettes than from cigarettes, but risks are associated with them. All in all, they do expose one to rather dangerous chemicals and increase the risk of lung diseases like chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. In my opinion, great caution has to be exercised and not fall into the perceptions that e-cigarettes are absolutely safe.
Last but not least, a fallacy I wish to dispel is the general belief that if lung cancer runs in your family, you will eventually have it. Genetics do play a role, but so do other factors like smoking and carcinogen exposures. Many people obviously have a family history of lung cancer but never develop it themselves, while many others without a family history still get diagnosed. I think it's important to be aware of the risks but not to assume a family history is a death sentence.
Posted Using InLeo Alpha