Whoever designed life got it completely wrong

I would not want to be immortal, I believe that one of the things that makes life attractive is its limited and fragile nature.

Does this mean that I agree with death?

Any answer I could give to the above question I think would be stupid, death is simply part of life, period.

What I disagree with is why the different ways we can die are so painful and tragic. Life is poorly designed, whoever did it got it completely wrong.

Life has enough challenges without having to deal with the physical, emotional and mental pain of death.

I have spent several days in a hospital watching the suffering of a very important person in my life whom I adore very much. I wish that with a kiss on the forehead all her pains would be relieved and she would get up, or if her time to leave this world has really come, she would do it in peace and harmony, lightly, as when she falls asleep.

It is not easy to be in a hospital seeing so many people suffering, fighting for their lives and seeing their relatives desperate, sad and fearful.

Death should be different, more peaceful, we should not be so fragile and vulnerable. The world should be reset, some say there is an Almighty, why doesn't he do it?

It seems that there is no beautiful way to die, although some have gone unexpectedly, without suffering, leaving suffering to those who loved him.

Death is always something to talk about and it is the only sure thing we have. Imagine a hypothetical situation where ❝you arrive at the scene of a car accident, the car is on fire and inside are two children, the driver is dead. There is no help available and you only have time to save one.

How do you make your choice, which do you choose and how would it effect you later knowing you only saved the one?❞

If one of the children is awake and the other is not, I would choose the one whose eyes are open, assuming the other has less chance of survival.

If both children are passed out and their bodies look whole, I would choose the one who is more accessible to me to beat time. Applies equally if both children ask for help.

If one of the children is screaming for help and the other is silent, I would choose the one who is screaming, assuming he or she has more will to live.

If either child is badly injured, I would choose the one who is more whole and has a better chance of surviving “whole.”

---

---

It would be terrible a situation like this, I am relieved that it is a hypothetical case, although it is very innocent to think that even more terrible things do not happen. If the lives of 2 children are almost in my hands and I can only save one, I would try to remain with the satisfaction that I did everything I could, I would get it into my head that the child who died has passed on to a better world than this crazy world that has been designed to take our lives in cruel and painful ways.

And would that the life I saved was the life of a noble soul, worth preserving in this strange world in which we live.

---

---

_{this weekend.This writing is inspired by @galenkp's proposal for}

_{Photograph of my property.}