You have given the same answer that had occurred to me, save the first child I found.
Another form of election does not make sense.
And you've made a great statement about the importance of preparing for these events.
Thank you so much for sharing it.
It seems fairly logical although it is a difficult question to answer as one doesn't know all the perametera. I guess that's why I broke it down to the most simple.
Find kid, remove kid, assess if it's safe to go for the second and act accordingly.
Thanks for your comment.
Your welcome.
I think it is the healthiest way of thinking, the one you have raised. Because it is a way free of preferences or prejudices.
Going for the simplest is what can help solve complex problems.
This question that you have answered will always be complex, due to the fact of having to "choose", that should not exist, it should always be possible to save both of them.
In an ideal world both would be saved. In the real world it's not always possible. Thanks for your reply.