A couple weeks ago, I wrote about how Democrats hate democracy. The Democratic National Convention kicks off in a week, where it is widely assumed Vice President Kamala Harris and her running mate, Minnesota governor Tim Walz, will be selected as the official candidates for President and Vice President in November's national election.
Under normal circumstances, there is a cycle of primary elections in each state winnowing the field of candidates down based on at least some semblance of public participation. Then the party insider "superdelegates" get to put their thumb on the scale. This year, they didn't even bother with that charade. A woman who didn't even make it to the Iowa caucuses and was explicitly chosen as VP based on her gender rather than her accomplishments is now being crowned by a party without even a pretense of polls beforehand. Isn't that at least slightly concerning?
And by the way, if Biden was not, in fact, "sharp as a tack," just who has been running the show for the last 3-1/2 years?
But those questions are just the beginning. What can we say about Walz?
I haven't been a Minnesotan for a quarter century, and my family moved away before I was ever eligible to vote, but the state has trended toward Democratic policies for ages. The Twin Cities radiated the malaise of welfare state entitlement programs and confiscatory taxation even then. As is so often the case, a major population center or two uses "democracy" to justify the bandwagon fallacy as they trample the sparsely-populated surrounding rural region, but that trend has escalated sharply.
Walz is a white boomer. He worked as a teacher, enlisted in the military, became a congresscritter, got himself elected governor, and now plans to be the next VP. It doesn't look like he has ever worked in the real productive economy of voluntary exchange. It also looks a lot like when Obama picked Biden as VP: Get an old-as-heck white dude for a running mate to look more legitimate if you aren't already an old white dude yourself. The optics aren't great.
But what about his record? Surely there's something good there, right? Well, Minnesota was... not good for freedom during the COVID panic, and Walz was in charge of the whole thing. When the George Floyd killing occurred, Walz was still the guy in charge. There's a lot of he-said-she-said online, but it's readily apparent things got way out of hand. What we can't escape is his statements about free speech.
"There's no guarantee to free speech on misinformation or hate speech, and especially around our democracy." (source and 3rd party analysis)
Yes. Yes, there is, you pompous moralistic authoritarian. At the federal level, it's called the first amendment to the United States Constitution. At his state level, there is Article 1, Section 3 of the Minnesota State Consitution. We live in an era where we have in living memory seen statements which were declared "misinformation" later acknowledged as accurate months after government pressured social media outlets to censor people for dissent. This man is absolutely a danger to liberty if this is his understanding of freedom.
Yes, I know Trump also said, "...take the guns first, go through due process second." Criticism of Harris and Walz is not support for Cheeto Mussolini, you ignorant troglodytes. Drop the false dichotomy of partisanship, please.
Walz and Harris are both abysmal on 2nd Amendment grounds, don't get me wrong. They're both of the opinion that only government should have anything even cosmetically considered an "assault weapon," and Walz actually signed the kind of "red flag laws" which promote theft first, kangaroo courts later. That's not how a defender of freedom behaves.
I remain politically homeless. If you think my concerns are misplaced, or my facts and reasoning are in error, by all means, chime in. You'll face a challenge in convincing me to shift back to supporting the political process. I have no king but Christ, and I condemn this vainglorious posturing of politics as exhibing all seven deadly sins.
EDIT
That's not a very uplifting post. How about a weird song in closing instead?
You can try all ya want!
I'm not your property
I told you before-
But you're still not listening!
Just so you know, most of the people who are smart enough to reject the false dichotomy and call themselves "politically homeless" are socialists. In other words, red-pilled on the current regime, but still hopelessly blue-pilled on government itself, and many of them think China is some kind of utopia. It's been wild to watch the Democrat apparatchiks smear them as "trumptards" despite them saying that the dems are "too far right" for their tastes. Thanks to the dissident left (as contrasted with the establishment left) rejecting the "Trump is Hitler" narrative, we now have articles about "MAGA Communism" or "Republicans are the real socialists," and finally, FINALLY, after seventy fucking years, an admission from the establishment that Nazis were indeed socialists, albeit somehow still right wing.
Oh, and apparently Russian propaganda is behind both the dissident right and the dissident left. Cannae make this shite up.
If the establishment doubles down on its current trajectory, I foresee a Bolshevik Revolution happening in the near future. Thoughts? I could go on, but I'd rather not leave you an entire book to read.
A financial collapse is all but inevitable, although timing remains to be seen. A civil war between the authoritarian left and authoritarian right is not impossible. The government schools have succeeded admirably over the last 44 years in educating people to just bicker over different flavors of state supremacy and pretend it means freedom. I'm feeling quite "black-pilled" on all things political.
That said, at least America has a lot of guns, and people who just want to be left alone have access to large enough magazines to confront hordes of pillagers. I just hope enough of them can dislodge the boots they've been deep-throating.
I can get along with the commies who don't have delusions of political monopoly. I've met a few who favor voluntary associations and collectivism without coercing outsiders. But most want to be the technocratic elite.
Interesting. I thought that at one point Walz had a rep as a pretty strong supporter of the 2a. Some things he has said regarding the 1st amendment are disturbing though. I also thought he had worked as a teacher and in manufacturing but I don't know the details.
The NRA gave him a good score when he was a congresscritter, but that's the NRA, and that was a while ago.
If Horrible Harris is not bad enough, she has chosen a like minded running mate.
Just listen to them. "[Orange man] is going to destroy OUR democracy"
I believe she means "our", in a way that means, her and the people that want to stay in charge's "democracy".
I feel that Horrible should just be written out of the race. But, there seems to be a lot of people that support her rhetoric. Meaning there is going to be more govern-cement to not leave me alone.
People have been taught to embrace the status quo of a two-party system, and the legacy media is unabashedly partisan. If Trump is bad, then Harris must be good, because Harris opposes Trump. Criticism of Harris can only be construed as support for Trump. It's a narrative too simple for a children's cartoon, but it still somehow works on enough adults to maintain the illusion that these psychopaths somehow "represent" us for the majority.
The campaign on Walz has nothing to do with his policies or qualifications... he's a "teddy bear", a cuddly, midwestern dad, twinkle in his eye, hunter, football coach, visit in the hardware store, very down to earth, authentic communicator, he seems happy, joyful. Perfect white guy as a sidekick to the half jamacian/indian woman.
Walz: "Drivers licenses for all!"
Me: "Why is the government mandating licenses for anyone?"
Just more proof no one represents me.
Haha the choices are looking more and more dismal.
Sometimes, I want to vote for the worst option just to collapse this place so we can start over.
!discovery 29
Congratulations @jacobtothe! You have completed the following achievement on the Hive blockchain And have been rewarded with New badge(s)
Your next target is to reach 57000 upvotes.
You can view your badges on your board and compare yourself to others in the Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word
STOP
Check out our last posts:
This post was shared and voted inside the discord by the curators team of discovery-it
Join our Community and follow our Curation Trail
Discovery-it is also a Witness, vote for us here
Delegate to us for passive income. Check our 80% fee-back Program