Yes, it is quite clear. I was struck by several concepts that you coin in this publication.

"Stake based curation", It is similar to when a Hivers delegates power to a curation project, i.e. he earns that right to a "curation Assessment", this was already going through my mind some time ago, however it is a delicate subject. Some may label it as a sale of votes.

To me this plan makes sense, it is what happens with the people who are in your feed, they have the right to a curation evaluation. What I do see uphill is that a single curator is enough for everyone, surely they are already planning to expand that.

I congratulate you for continuously creating great ideas.