I think it's all about the details. It's about rewarding good content, regardless of the strength of the account, and working to improve some flaws. Nothing spectacular, we should look on ideas like a little seed. If we care the idea how it should be threated we'll get a nice project (in this case community) that's stable and trustworthy.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
The seeds take time to develop, especially when the growth challenges the current mindset. Many still live with scarcity as their guiding force and therefore see more value in focusing on maximizing themselves, even if they would make more over time by maximizing the group.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
It can be a double-edged sword. I prefer to change myself and change others with my work and approach. I like to be an example by deeds not by words, so due to that I'm progressing as much as I can, working on my posts to be more entertaining/informative and it's all about patience. I see bright future in this project and I'm going to work to make that future happen. Maybe one day I'll be swimming with the dolphins 😄
If you mean it as you wrote it, then you intentionally invite chaos to roam around you and reinvent yourself again and again. That's a dangerous game to play in the long run.
Plato testified multiple times, that a man has to lead by example and not by word. That describes the righteous path of a leader in societies. But it does conflict with change and personal reinvention.
I'm not quite sure I've understood what you want to say, but the point of my comment right above was about giving the best from yourself to improve myself, and in parallel, the community itself.
Yap, I might have read too much into your sentences by myself. cheers !BEER
There's no place for negativity in this place. At least from me 😄
Cheers man, be well!
View or trade
BEER.Hey @tonac, here is a little bit of
BEERfrom @manniman for you. Enjoy it!Learn how to earn FREE BEER each day by staking your
BEER.There's a lot of meaning in only a few words. My first thought was, 'Investing in a community is pretty dangerous in the wild-wild-webs'. There's an unlimited amount of energy sinks available, what are the actual external criteria to make an initial decision? hmmm