But the code itself doesn’t change. It’s the same tool, just being told to behave a certain way by the users prompt. From the AI itself, plagiarism is copying the text without adjustments. If you adjust very little, you still must cite. It’s the same as if you were to copy the text of a book without citing it. In school, you would get a zero and punishment. The same kind of shunning the community gives to people who plagiarize. The AI does not plagiarize because it generates the text but once it’s done, the text that is generated is now officially the ai’s/openai’s. If you are just copying text, I would argue that it would still be under the ownership of the one that generated it. Therefore, income from that should either be burned or donated.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
The algorithm is open source. It’s the data and training that go into it the differentiator.
If there is any citation, it’s the common knowledge and the “internet” itself, which would be ridiculous to “cite”.
Let’s just assume going forward more and more of the stuff we see will be by default assisted by AI.
Have you seen any news that could be generated by AI with a citation alluding to AI?