11-21-25 How Crypto Space Has Become Mostly Centralized Trash With Hive & Bitcoin & Monero Being Rare Exceptions

in LeoFinance23 days ago

Most people in crypto still cling to the fantasy that everything in this space is decentralized, rebellious, and outside the reach of corporate or government control. That was the dream, sure. But look around now: most of the big-name coins are centralized systems hiding behind decentralization buzzwords. Their founders call the shots, their insider teams pull the strings, and their chains halt whenever something goes wrong. It’s a joke. The industry drifted far from its original mission, and most people don’t even realize how far the rot has spread.

Bitcoin remains the one asset that never sold out. No premine, no CEO, no foundation acting like a shadow government. Bitcoin is slow to change by design, and that’s exactly why it’s still the most decentralized monetary protocol ever built. The miners don’t answer to a single authority, the devs don’t run some dictatorship, and anyone trying to force corporate control crashes straight into a wall of global consensus. That’s real decentralization, not some marketing line slapped on a VC coin.

Hive fits in that same rare category. Most social or smart-contract chains brag about being “community-owned,” yet have founders with millions of tokens and total veto power. Hive doesn’t operate like that. When it broke away from a corrupt takeover attempt, the community pushed out the centralized threat and rebuilt without a dictator. That’s about as decentralized and battle-tested as it gets. No company owns Hive. No wallet controls the chain. No leadership group can flip a switch and rewrite the rules. It’s one of the few blockchains where users actually hold power.

Now compare that to the so-called “top” altcoins. Most have massive premines, insider allocations, and corporate-like teams running everything from upgrades to marketing narratives. They don’t even hide it anymore. They hold conferences like tech startups, not decentralized networks. They brag about “governance” as if giving whales 90% of the vote counts as some grand democratic experiment. These chains are centralized products, not decentralized ecosystems.

Worse, a lot of these centralized chains freeze wallets, reverse transactions, or pause the entire chain when something breaks. Can you imagine Bitcoin halting for upgrades or political decisions? It would never happen. Hive wouldn’t either, because both systems rely on decentralized consensus, not admin keys. A blockchain that can be paused isn’t a blockchain. It’s an app pretending to be something bigger.

This centralization problem also leads to censorship. Many of these projects claim to care about freedom, but the moment content goes against their narrative or a regulator pressures them, they fold. The beauty of Hive is that it doesn’t work that way. The chain itself doesn’t censor. The protocol doesn’t bend. Users are responsible for filtering what they don’t want, not some corporation deciding for everyone else. That’s true decentralization of both money (Bitcoin) and speech/data (Hive).

Crypto markets will eventually split into two camps: systems that stay aligned with the original cypherpunk values, and systems that become corporate replicas of Web2. Bitcoin and Hive already sit firmly in the first camp. Everything else is slowly drifting into the second, whether people want to admit it or not. It’s not about tribalism; it’s about calling things what they are.

In the end, decentralization isn’t a slogan. It’s a structure. Bitcoin and Hive actually operate in a way that protects users, protects the protocol, and prevents capture by wealthy insiders or corporations. That’s rare in today’s crypto landscape. And as more people realize how centralized most chains really are, the value of true decentralization is only going to grow.

Sort:  

Dunnit - All running on Linus Ubuntu now - after a few issues with camera drivers, all well now untitled.gif