Terror for Dollars

in LeoFinance6 days ago (edited)

How do you make a terrorist?

In order to consider the question, it is first worth defining what a terrorist is, and who better to do that than the Federal Bureau of Investigation, because they have dealt with terrorism in many forms across a plethora of television series and movies.

Terrorism Definitions

International terrorism: Violent, criminal acts committed by individuals and/or groups who are inspired by, or associated with, designated foreign terrorist organizations or nations (state-sponsored).

Domestic terrorism: Violent, criminal acts committed by individuals and/or groups to further ideological goals stemming from domestic influences, such as those of a political, religious, social, racial, or environmental nature.

As you can see by that second definition, pretty much, many violent crimes could be shoehorned and considered acts of terrorism. It might be easy to see terrorism in an explosive device outside a building, or a car being driven at high speed through a crowd with intent - but what about the rape of a woman by a man who believes women are inferior? The opinion is socially-charged and the act itself is furthering ideological goals, is it not?

image.png

Free Radicals

When large-scale terrorist events happen, the media comes out condemning them as heinous and evil, which they may just be. However, they also talk about radicalisation, but they are a large part of the mechanism that is used to radicalise and they themselves as information for profit distributors, are in the radicalisation game. Every topic is positioned to be divisive, to be emotionally charged, and is used as fuel to feed the ad-revenue model they worship.

What an advert for Tesla...

image.png

Side panels are straight, the tires are still inflated.

Politics and the media is driven by polarisation. It is about turning one group against another. So, is it any wonder that in a world full of people who are fed a constant stream of enemies, whilst also being disconnected socially, and siloed into information streams that confirm their biases, that some portion aren't going to become extreme enough to the point they will act antisocially toward supporting their views? Isn't it obvious that when people are struggling mentally, physically, and financially, while they are depressed, with a dwindling supply of healthy personal relationships, and a lowering sense of consequence of action, or even regard for others or one's own life, that suicidal, public violence should be expected?

Every time this kind of thing happens and it happens often, the focus gets put on the evil individual or group who orchestrated and performed it. However, I think this is a copout, because what seems to be happening to me is that this is a systemic problem, that is not tied to the groups themselves, though some groups are going to attract or help create more ideological violence than others. Pretty much though, once people are conditioned into the state required to terrorise, the ideology no longer matters, it is just the flag that is flown that defines the borders. The acts themselves, might be the same whether killing for a religion, a political view, a social view, or for the environment.

So, how do you make a terrorist?

Isolate them, and feed them the right information until they believe in something they are willing to die for - or kill others for. And, because we have made that information flow so valuable, because we have put it at the core of government and corporate profit and control, it is obvious that it is going to be used to do just that, profit and control. That is the algorithm in play, and like any well-designed algorithm, the results should be somewhat expected. The formula they use polarises people and isolates them, and humans are predictable in those conditions.

Blame the Algorithms?

After these events, they always talk about what the perpetrators have posted to social media, or what they have been searching in the leadup prior. But, it would be interesting to step back further than that and see where the seeds started, and what kinds of feeds were automatically curated for them, designed to give them just what they want, when they want it, backed by adverts to earn revenue for the platforms. They are fed the prefect mixtape for years on end to push us into buying all kinds of products and ideas. Remember....

To further ideological goals

In the past, it was far more difficult and took a huge amount of time for ideologies to form and spread across a population, let alone get to the point that people are willing to die for them. Yet, we live in a world of globalised data and information is spread to the masses in moments, with many support platforms and networks setup in an instant for the new idea to attract, take root, and be nurtured in moments - on any side of the argument. To form a community of like minds.

Systematic Sadness

As sad as it is, I don't think much is going to change in the near-term, because there is just too much money in creating enemies. Business runs on competition, as does politics. We are built to compete and we are encouraged to fight for what we believe, under the assumption that what we believe is the right thing to fight for, without having the skills or incentive to actually investigate what we believe in, or why we believe it.

The system incentivises victimhood.

Everyone of us is a victim, and everyone else is to blame. Inflicting hurt on others is justified, because those others hurt the individual. An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth, right? And, what does it matter, since human life keeps getting degraded in order to maximise profits - continually oppressed, and bled dry of value, with little chance of ever getting out of the cycle, because, we are the ones who support the system to run as it is. We support the polarisation, because we always think that we are on the right side of the ideology, even if we know no alternative.

And when these now inevitable terror events happen, we turn to the corporations and governments for the truth. The same sources that played a role in radicalising the terrorists in the first place.

Isolate. Feed. Make them believe.

Give them an identity to defend.

Taraz
[ Gen1: Hive ]

Posted Using InLeo Alpha

Sort:  

Agree to a large part of this. New Orgs knows upsetting news gets eyeballs, social media platforms elevate conflict above all us to keep users on the platforms, billionaires fund misinformation to keep people distracted and disorganized.

There is a missing step though... and that's the forming of the radicalized communities. People are isolated and fed misinformation as you've said... the solution is to form local community.. but often what happens is people find radicalized communities that justify and encourage violence.

There's a reason that all 3 of Trump's assassination attempts and this car bomb were by Trump supporters - they've found community with a violence-loving radicalized group within the MAGA movement.

The violence is only going to get worse... especially as social services like the VA is cut under DOGE.

You are absolutely right, I skipped a big piece. One of the problems with the way I write is the ideas at the start, don't always make it in.

It should have been introduced when talking about the platforms, and the places setup to support, because they also support the community, the like minds. It gives them a home.

NB:

  • I added a short bit there about giving a home.
  • I also added "Give them an identity to defend." at the end.

I think that the polarisation process is about building an identity, something to resist the enemy, a counterpart. And, the continual slicing of the groups into smaller fragments, supercharges those bits of identity. People are losing their multifaceted selves, to a radical singular image of who they think they are.

The violence is only going to get worse... especially as social services like the VA is cut under DOGE.

I would say that a lot of mental health services will be further reduced, and I am guessing they aren't well funded now.

Yes!

I honestly hate terms like 'right', 'left', 'conservatives' and 'liberals' because we are actually multi-faceted and can hold lots of different beliefs, thoughts and ideals that don't fit neatly into just one of those boxes... but people crave community and sometimes mistake cliques/cults for community.

Community is about belonging rather than fitting in and working towards a mission or goal, whereas cliques are about gate-keeping and establishing identity on who isn't part of the group - which sometimes encourages violence towards those not in the group.

If there is a true division, it's really the 0.1% versus the rest of us, but they spend absolutely incredible resources keeping us fighting and divided.

but people crave community and sometimes mistake cliques/cults for community.

For sure. There is a lot of this going on across many aspects of life. Like lonely people mistaking sex for intimacy, or flavour for nutrition. I reckon a lot of our world is made of inadequate substitutes.

If there is a true division, it's really the 0.1% versus the rest of us, but they spend absolutely incredible resources keeping us fighting and divided.

Yet, in the US at least, they keep getting voted into power as representative of the people. Inadequate substitutes.

I don't think your definitions are quite accurate. Terrorism is "the calculated use of violence to create a general climate of fear in a population and thereby to bring about a particular political objective." This is distinct from assassination, resistance fighting, and war, although I would argue the campaigns sold to the public as war are usually large-scale terrorism in practice.

Isolation, hate, and fear certainly do drive some vulnerable people to extreme actions, but I think the term "terrorism" is overused by people with a political agenda and political enemies.

My definitions are from the FBI - I have seen many movies about it ;D

The definitions will change, but I had to grab something. When it comes to resistance fighting, whether it is terrorism or not depends on the perspective, doesn't it?

Isolation, hate, and fear certainly do drive some vulnerable people to extreme actions, but I think the term "terrorism" is overused by people with a political agenda and political enemies.

This is because you are a Nazi....

That is a bad joke. However, this is the case today, isn't it? Terms used by people who don't really have an experience with what the true meaning is. I don't think the murder in NY of the insurance guy was terrorism, yet, they have now set a legal precedent - dangerous territory imo.

The FBI doesn't like the official definition because they are a terrorist organization. There's a reason we joke every time the FBI "foils a terrorist plot" that they were the ones who instigated it in the first place. After 9/11, they'd find the dumbest kid in the mosque and feed him propaganda and supplies. Usually they would "heroically save the day!" with much fanfare. Usually. They also instigated the Governor Whitmer kidnapping. And that's just what got publicized.

I am one of those who think that there is a deep connection between terrorist groups and national intelligence agencies. They are used by intelligence agencies to make people, leaders, governments, and states accept things. Intelligence agencies always know who is doing what. Will they not know what terrorist organizations are doing?

I agree with you. On top of that, I think a lot of their activities are geared toward making terrorists.

I think most of the radicalization is happening via online forums, religious organizations and extreme right and extreme left media.

It is an ecosystem of hate.

Elon actually made a tweet about that truck and pointed out how it did exactly what it was supposed to. Definitely a great advertisement for them. I still think they are god awful ugly though!

Very, very ugly!

It's all about money they will continue to radicalize people if it means profit. It's so sad to see what media has become.

The media is just working on the profit algorithm and we keep feeding them.

The formula they use polarises people and isolates them, and humans are predictable in those conditions.

Isolate. Feed. Make them believe.

You could sum up pretty good the roots of all the growing polarization in our societies today. The victimization, and the true believe that the "out world" is against our believes, is the perfect yeast to leaven the dough of cruelty

You're right about all of this. But there is a group that is behind the corporations and governments that is orchestrating this. Ephesians Chapter 6 names them.

I think that they especially choose those, who are psychologically not normal, have no goal left in their life and have lost their self-confidence and goodwill, to make terrorist.

As people become more segmented, isolated, or stripped of a sense of belonging to or a connection to the people around them - then the frequency of aberrant events may increase.

Definitions for terrorism drift and change over time, not for the least because states employ methods that are terrorism in the objective case. Within the past century the Prime Ministers and Parliamentarians of many countries have been in the past "terrorists".

It often seems to come down to who's writing or rewriting the accounts - and all of it no comfort to the person who was just killed, or their families.

PIZZA!

$PIZZA slices delivered:
@danzocal(9/10) tipped @tarazkp

Jungle law. If you're strong, meaning rich and powerful, it's self defense. If you lack the above qualities, you get the other definition. For acts of desperation that hurt random civil people because that is where weak spots are found. Those actually hated are tougher to reach. Again, for both sides of a conflict.

What an advert for Tesla...

That is the first thing I thought when I saw this story. But now as the details continue to come out, some many of the details just don't add up. Missing remains but intact records? This job smell like funny business.