I don't think this would really be any different than former U.S. presidents trying to re-establish a system that put money in the hands of the people (like the green back dollar), but since one of the primary functions government assumes authority over is commerce, so if people are going to turn to the government to issue money wouldn't it be better to use something universally accepted and stable (by comparison)?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Hi @sinistry,
You actually raise an important point of view, which I hadn't considered.
I agree that this function of currency falls within the purview or power of government. I think it's interesting irony that a technology built for freedom is being mandated.
It makes us pause to think, what does the government already mandate and is this mandate within it's scope of powers and societal norms or is it different.
If this were any other currency change, would we object as strongly?
Goodness gracious, this forum is amazing in the delightful points of view which are from a 360 degree sopectrum around an issue.
It really makes the statement...
... valid.
Thanks,
@defigeek
P.S.
Love your name. In English it's an interesting amalgam of "sinister and ministry".
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
English is my native tongue and I chose it for specifically that reason. 😁
You see, my mom wanted me to be a minister, but I like all the fun sins, so I’m meeting her halfway and preaching those. 😜
Ha HA HA..
Love it.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta