I have noticed that when the @leo.voter curates, it does so in HIVE!
Wouldn't it be good to have it also with some LEO Power so it would be distributing some rewards in $LEO ? #inleo #feedback
I have noticed that when the @leo.voter curates, it does so in HIVE!
Wouldn't it be good to have it also with some LEO Power so it would be distributing some rewards in $LEO ? #inleo #feedback
I believe that's because people delegate HIVE to @leo.voter and get $LEO in return. I'd love if every @leo.voter's vote was followed by a vote from @leofinance because that's the account that gives massive $LEO votes from my experience.
ohhhh I see. And do you think it is better for them to keep them separate or would it be better to maybe transfer some of that LEO on the leofinance account, and then stake it on the leo.voter so the account would curate in LEO as well?
I don't know... I see some value in keeping them separate because sometimes you want to upvote a long-form post that's not posted through the inleo interface, in which case the LEO rewards will be lost.
Okay, I see how that can be a problem then.
There isnt Leo Power delegated. Only Hive Power.
yeah, but shouldn't the account hold and have some staked LEO? so that way they would also be distributing the LEO rewards?
Why would they want to do that? Dont you want to curate your LP?
i wouldn't say curate! But since I guess we all want to be upvoting here the stuff we like. And there is way more content so we are voting with a smaller percentage. Would be good for all of us to have as much LP as possible. So many small votes worth something can still get people nice rewards for hundreds of likes, no?
Yes it would be good to have as much LP as possible. That is why powering up is of benefit.
But why would Leovoter have LP delegated to it? To generate LEO to buy LEO?
That, and also to be able to generate LEO rewards when they vote on the long format blogs create with inleo! That way we could be directly be making rewards in LEO