That's true, however, if you choose people it's most democratic and fair (at least to me) to elect/choose/vote for/whatever them for a limited time and then they are replaced.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
That's true, however, if you choose people it's most democratic and fair (at least to me) to elect/choose/vote for/whatever them for a limited time and then they are replaced.
Yeah, but the trick is that they might be replaced any moment. And if work is good, why replacement?
That's the reason why you have voting in half-year/year... I think the half-year is good, things go faster online, but, again, that's just my opinion...
!ENGAGE 10
ENGAGEtokens.