If a winner of something gets excluded for winning again on the next round, they might not participate as much on the next. 🤔 They would still participate if they love the contest and the community, but not as much as when they are qualified to win the prize. 🤓 !CTP !LUV
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
@savvytester(2/4) gave you LUV. tools | wallet | discord | community | <>< daily
HiveBuzz.me NFT for Peace
Ok. I forgot the exact word said by anomadsoul. To paraphrase, he said something like "winning the 20k delegation power the second time straight is very rare."
The gambler's fallacy happens when somebody would claim that they have a higher or lower chance of winning again the next time because they won or lost last round if the chance to win remains the same. 🤓
Oh! I forgot that you love numbers. Mathematically, that's correct! 💲🦈🤣
My last comment was not about numbers. 🤔 It's about logic. 🤓😏
That's my initial impression, but then I remember your love of numbers and so I thought perhaps that's the reason why you are reminded of that "gambler's fallacy".
!CTP
I would say that the reason why I got reminded of the gambler's fallacy is because you said that it is very rare to win the Leo Orca Delegation twice in a row. 🤓😏 !CTP