I recognise Richard Halls having watched some of his stuff over the years. And yes, I like his vibe. I also like that he is not afraid to tackle that inevitable question any serious historian must face:
If human evolution is linear, how is it that the further back in history we go, the more magnificent the constructions?
I mentioned the pyramids as one of many examples. What about Baalbek in Lebanon, constructed around the birth of Christ? (I think!)
Knowing we are unable to repeat this level of construction today must surely create some kind of friction in the mind of a historian?
I would be genuinely interested to hear your personal answer to this question.
I think our timelines may be woefully off.(intentionally propagated - for what reason? I'm not sure - yet...)
The same goes for the reasons for Darwinism (and gaping holes in the theory) being 'settled science'...Mmmmm.......
I'd hypothesize that all of it it has 'something' to do with 'free energy'.
Lost (hidden from us) knowledge.
establishment historians won't rock any boats -not when their substantial funding comes from 'the powers that be' - to maintain a narrative.
Excellent answer!
I do agree the timelines are off and Darwin proposed a theory which was quickly hailed as truth to hide a vast ocean of history from us. Literally!
And yep, free energy is likely at the heart of it. Nations cannot be controlled if energy cannot be controlled.
Not sure why but I was in fear for a moment you were going to give me a very different kind of answer. Very happy to see you are right there on the cutting edge of thought!
Enjoy your weekend ;)