From what I have seen he uses wiki only to share with us the given narrative and I'm pretty sure he understands its limitations. Granted his knowledge of history is likely not up to scratch when compared to your own but he does seem to be quite good at finding amazing images to scrutinise in a way which gets the juices flowing for us truth seekers.
Have you looked much into the World's Fairs of the 19th century? So many incredible buildings supposedly built for exhibitions only to be destroyed shortly after. Like these ones in Paris for example.
I don't know about you but if I were in charge of a city I would elect to keep these ones. Why destroy such beauty? From what I can tell there are 1000s of buildings around the world which fall into this category.
Today the monuments we build don't even come close to this kind of splendour, so there is just something about this part of history which doesn't add up for me. Or any of the older history really. Do you think we could build the pyramids today? I doubt it. Which is weird right? Even a historian must concede this to a certain extent?
Anyway, I sent him to you to get your professional perspective. And I very much appreciate your time and your honesty.
I will check richplanet and see if he tickles my interest ;)
...if you want some trippy insights in the pyramids, read my mates book.
(not very good reading - dull - pesky maths - he's a maths geek -but it will blow you away if you like that kind of thing!)
The Incomplete Pyramids by Stephen H. Brabin
I recognise Richard Halls having watched some of his stuff over the years. And yes, I like his vibe. I also like that he is not afraid to tackle that inevitable question any serious historian must face:
If human evolution is linear, how is it that the further back in history we go, the more magnificent the constructions?
I mentioned the pyramids as one of many examples. What about Baalbek in Lebanon, constructed around the birth of Christ? (I think!)
Knowing we are unable to repeat this level of construction today must surely create some kind of friction in the mind of a historian?
I would be genuinely interested to hear your personal answer to this question.
I think our timelines may be woefully off.(intentionally propagated - for what reason? I'm not sure - yet...)
The same goes for the reasons for Darwinism (and gaping holes in the theory) being 'settled science'...Mmmmm.......
I'd hypothesize that all of it it has 'something' to do with 'free energy'.
Lost (hidden from us) knowledge.
establishment historians won't rock any boats -not when their substantial funding comes from 'the powers that be' - to maintain a narrative.
Excellent answer!
I do agree the timelines are off and Darwin proposed a theory which was quickly hailed as truth to hide a vast ocean of history from us. Literally!
And yep, free energy is likely at the heart of it. Nations cannot be controlled if energy cannot be controlled.
Not sure why but I was in fear for a moment you were going to give me a very different kind of answer. Very happy to see you are right there on the cutting edge of thought!
Enjoy your weekend ;)