Interesting stuff there. I enjoyed the read. Didn't know this was your field? Am looking at history myself at the moment and my feeling is that something happened in the early part of the 19th century, something like a cataclysm which wiped out most of humanity, providing an opportunity to re-write history, omitting Tartary (a massive empire which included Russia) from the story. So, any history prior to around 1820 is questionable at best. The people may have been real but the dates and their stories have been augmented to better fit the desired narrative of history. And all of this designed by the Rothschilds of course. I will try to remember to drop you a link when I put out my historical article.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
History has always been my field (from 5 years old and up - we're talking trainspotter levels... lol)
...an interesting perspective you have there - I promise to give it my critical eye when I read it..
Excellent to learn this about you! Hope you're ready to have your mind blown ;)
There are many who study photographs of the magnificent architecture of the early 19th century and they do a very good job at pointing out how ridiculous the supposed histories of these buildings are. I strongly recommend a chap called JonLevi on YouTube who I believe is the best of them.
Just take your pick with his films. I find all his work fascinating.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC5vXBfxN7rxKeJHJxS8dNDw
I would be interested to know what you think after digesting some of what he has to say.
My mind was blown.
People believe this?
I'm not sure where you want me to start....looking at the lack of historical facts, not even getting into the quasi-metaphysical aspects.
(he uses wiki ffs!)
Star forts (for example) are strategically constructed as they were, for a very real reason - no metaphysics required. No weird reason that they follow water ways and coasts.
All very simple.
The same for Indian structures in the south west US/mexico - there is nothing mysterious about this...
Documenting 'scree' - the rubble at the bottom of mountians , caused from weather erosion over eons - is nothing mysterious.
It's standard geological formations.
Throwing in random photographs to fit a narrative that's underway, doesn't really cut it.
He's all over the place .
He didn't even know of US assassinations of presidents - (by his own admission on video)... except for Lincoln and Kennedy...
Doesn't that tell you something?
....Just, maybe?
Sorry, matey.
I'm not being twatty - just honest based on watching 2 vids.
(That was me being nice - I can do a critical appraisal if you like...lol)
...if you want some more (in my opinion) alternative perspectives - check our Richard d halls 'richplanet.net'
....research through his older material - All very forensic and structured.
From what I have seen he uses wiki only to share with us the given narrative and I'm pretty sure he understands its limitations. Granted his knowledge of history is likely not up to scratch when compared to your own but he does seem to be quite good at finding amazing images to scrutinise in a way which gets the juices flowing for us truth seekers.
Have you looked much into the World's Fairs of the 19th century? So many incredible buildings supposedly built for exhibitions only to be destroyed shortly after. Like these ones in Paris for example.
I don't know about you but if I were in charge of a city I would elect to keep these ones. Why destroy such beauty? From what I can tell there are 1000s of buildings around the world which fall into this category.
Today the monuments we build don't even come close to this kind of splendour, so there is just something about this part of history which doesn't add up for me. Or any of the older history really. Do you think we could build the pyramids today? I doubt it. Which is weird right? Even a historian must concede this to a certain extent?
Anyway, I sent him to you to get your professional perspective. And I very much appreciate your time and your honesty.
I will check richplanet and see if he tickles my interest ;)
...if you want some trippy insights in the pyramids, read my mates book.
(not very good reading - dull - pesky maths - he's a maths geek -but it will blow you away if you like that kind of thing!)
The Incomplete Pyramids by Stephen H. Brabin
I recognise Richard Halls having watched some of his stuff over the years. And yes, I like his vibe. I also like that he is not afraid to tackle that inevitable question any serious historian must face:
If human evolution is linear, how is it that the further back in history we go, the more magnificent the constructions?
I mentioned the pyramids as one of many examples. What about Baalbek in Lebanon, constructed around the birth of Christ? (I think!)
Knowing we are unable to repeat this level of construction today must surely create some kind of friction in the mind of a historian?
I would be genuinely interested to hear your personal answer to this question.
I think our timelines may be woefully off.(intentionally propagated - for what reason? I'm not sure - yet...)
The same goes for the reasons for Darwinism (and gaping holes in the theory) being 'settled science'...Mmmmm.......
I'd hypothesize that all of it it has 'something' to do with 'free energy'.
Lost (hidden from us) knowledge.
establishment historians won't rock any boats -not when their substantial funding comes from 'the powers that be' - to maintain a narrative.