The problem with revealing HOW you spot it's AI gen is that you give information to get around such systems and checks.

Whilst I believe a mere checker isn't ENOUGH, there's a whole heap of other clues that add to a bigger judgement about whether it's AI generated or not.

I've been dead right on the ones I've spotted so far, and I reckon spot on with those I've given the benefit of doubt to.

I think you are right to worry that AI checkers are not always accurate/tell the full story BUT I would hope that's not the only way curators are checking.

Saying that, I did see one flagged by HW I believed to be human so... Yeah. I don't like the militancy there as it doesn't always stand up. Plus, um, why not issue a warning first?

Most of the AI posts I have a prob with are generic fucking rubbish. If they were good, and it said it was AI, yeah, whatever. If I don't agree I can scroll on by. But intentional dishonesty sucks..