You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Call To Vote // Hive Documentary proposal

in LeoFinance3 years ago

The problem is that you say it won't "look" like a shilm but the whole idea of shilling is obfuscation of the truth and it's not meant to look like shilling. You say the story of Hive but it looks like you are telling the story of a certain subsection of Hive and not the entire chain considering who will be involved in the script supervision. I don't think you will tell the story of the people who are sacrificed along the way. The top witnesses historically do not have much if any compassion for its excessive churn rate, instead seeking to onboard new users to replace those lost to make up for the poor retention. These people are Hive too. Are you planning to tell their story?

Sort:  

Let me rephrase. It wont be a shill film. I think I made that clear in the proposal and in multiple comments. All of which you can read.

Script supervision is in the part of getting the events right as they happened. The story of Hive is only a part of the documentary. The documentary in most length will cover crypto in general and not just Hive.

I don't think you will tell the story of the people who are sacrificed along the way.

Ive no idea what youre on about. We dont do human sacrifice here. You must have mistaken Hive for the Aztec.

@logiczombie @frot @lucylin @ura-soul @truthforce @kennyskitchen

Please tag everyone you know on Hive who was had your rewards sacrificed by a whale claiming they are saving the rewards for higher quality posts, or some kind of illogical excuse that covers for the reward pool abuse argument.

I don't think this film studio understands the bias on the platform well enough to do a documentary about it.

@lordbutterfly you can easily check out @lucylin, @frot or @ura-soul pages, they are victims of what I call rewards pool abuse and its used to cancel people off this platform entirely.

Distributed Proof of Stake IS NOT SECURE.

Expect downvotes if you refer to hive as safe, secure or established... This is a pumped up shitcoin with witnesses distracting us from their own failures by pumping the price to compete with steem, and selling out to splinterlands.

This will not end well foe the sycophants on this platform who are trying to impress a status quo.

Please tag everyone you know on Hive who was had your rewards sacrificed by a whale claiming they are saving the rewards for higher quality posts

Expect downvotes if you refer to hive as safe, secure or established...

Complains about people getting downvoted unfairly. Threatens to downvote me for calling Hive safe and secure.

You sir are a clown. 😂

Is multiple accounts being removed from the reward pool entirely the same as me downvoting you, obviously not...

the systematic abuse of the rewards pool occurring through the downvote utility by more than just 1 account. I do not have a majority share, the accounts I am tagging have been removed from the rewards pool by some of the largest balances of Hive Power on the network.

If you are not bias, you can see very clearly on @logiczombie that it's about 10-25 accounts ruining the network, and making it not secure. Having delegations that expire would remove any pseudononymous delegations providing unequal opportunity to new witnesses who want to participate in the top 20.

If you really are going to use ad hominem references towards me for criticism if your work, I really wonder what your journalism skills are even worth in the first place. Hopefully you see the bigger picture.

I have no desire to post in this swamp, tbh - but it's profiting me, so I will - once a week - just to keep the downvoting debacle in a current news cycle for my purposes...

See you on blurt ( i don't even log into here now to check on comments) - My upcoming posts here will have the same ones over there, to link to , for any comments.

Does blurtt have delegations and a curation trail like hive.vote?

The delegations expire after 1 year now, they are proactive on the issues that hive is stagnant on.

This "journalist" just ignored me for criticizing their work, so I am going to now use this as a example of the bandwagon effect on Hive.

This "journalist" doesn't care about bias and plans to call their product a documentary...

The people you have overseeing your script have bias and a specific narrative they want to tell without telling the entire truth. So your attempt at "getting events right" is only from one perspective. Everything on the blockchain is public which you can read so this churn rate I speak of is not a rumour or me confusing Hive with Aztecs. It's a demonstrable fact. There are many dissenters within Hive and they are just as much a part of the story as anyone else. I'm not really against the documentary on its face but with everything you've presented about it, I don't have confidence in it being a fair or honest representation of facts. I'm happy to be wrong and it should be noted that my criticism is only meant to pushback against the normal call for inspiration porn that is common here. All FOMO no FUD. I do believe you have a more balanced purview than that at least which is why I urge you to consider a broader section of Hive and juxtapose these ideas against each other. I am rather quiet on the chain because I believe many of the top witnesses act as or more criminally than Sun. I know this wouldn't be a popular opinion to blog about here but this is backed up by facts and I have been working with a thinktank observing and trying to seek better solutions. I'm not as quick to paint a broad brush about the "cabal" as others. I think many witnesses are probably swept up in the moment and doing the best they can from their perspective with the situation they are in. I'm available for comment on your documentary if you need a neutral fact checker or any other role I can play to help the documentary broaden its scope and authenticity.

This "journalist" muted me for mentioning the rewards pool abuse with downvotes.

Just keep that in mind before you think they aren't bias, it appears they are actively bias and willfully overlooking that information now.

Oh no wonder he never heard of that. He mutes everyone it happens to. It all makes sense now.

Aka this will be a shill documentary and I will be on full damage control anywhere I see these lies being propagated.

Lol. Fuck sake Phil, get a grip

This "journalist" muted me when I criticized a potential bias they may be unknowingly participating in. I will not be supporting this punditry.

.....hahahahahahahahahahaha - you're funny....

You beat me to it matey