You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Does Liquid Hive Power Solve One Of Hive's Biggest Issues?

in LeoFinance4 years ago

Liquid versus safety is ongoing discussion
in the mind of everyone.
Reducing the 13 to a lower number
may entice but at what cost.
#Hive price is moving sideways for a while now.
This program will fill the gap till we have other concrete ways to have more liquid.

Sort:  

There are merits to that debate on both sides. Personally, I don't think you need 13 weeks to provide safety. A 4 week power down time makes a lot more sense to me. Still have a week before any of your HP becomes liquid in case there is an attack.

As for the price, I am not sure changing the power down time will truly do much for the price. That is always an argument presented when looking at making changes, such as the EIP.

In the end the price is going to do what it will do.

We will see how this all unfolds. It will be an interesting debate.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

So far the community should decide
on that matter pretty soon. More posts about it
will oblige a change.
Clear sense of mind your answers are right on point cause
it will benefit more people to power up and down quicker.
In the dev sense of mind, not much I can say, I thought it was a security move to leave it at 13.
As we move forward, ideas should mingle and the community will be a winner.
Kudos to your articles.

oh yes 4 weeks is a cool idea