I think of it as in the value in the den or pool does not matter. Then considering the incentive for being in either I get a 3x return on being in the pool. Kinda like being paid to take the loss. The pools fuel my den and if I don't put back in the den I change that over to a split on the pools again. However with BUSD-CUB I think I will lose regardless which is why I effectively move some over time into the ones that could go up together like bnb-cub , leo-bnb etc . Still loss but I think a bit less and still great incentive to keep about half of what I have in the pools.
Nice writeup.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
Interesting perspective. Are you considering your contribution to the LP as helping the community, rather than doing it to maximize profit? I can't think of another reason you would be invested somewhere you think you will lose regardless.
I am only losing if I look at my LP in isolation.. and fair enough I am quite lazy to track these things but from my first week alone I have been able to fund the Den to equal value of my entire LP. Overall I feel I am earning optimally but definitely at higher risk and I should probably remove my LP on the cub-busd specifically and re-add it at the new "norm" since I added cub at I think $3 ... If I can keep inline with the norm I am personally then reducing my impermanent loss while gaining from the amplified reward... I guess that is how I rationalize it since I don't know the ins and outs of the math or keep track really.