Nothing about these statements say that this performer needed the foot fetish money, so what's the issue here?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Nothing about these statements say that this performer needed the foot fetish money, so what's the issue here?
Thats not the main issue . Its the fact that she had to resort to OF even though she was a huge star at one point . These companies and labels taking a big cut of her profit .
Of course they are, that's their business model.
It STILL doesn't explain whether she actually NEEDED to resort to fetish porn, or if she just WANTED the extra money. There is a world of difference between the two.