I actually enjoy Bing's little chatbot. Just tried it out as an experiment. For searching I find it to be really efficient, rarely using google now.
I think it falls apart though when those sites that depend on clicks no longer get clicks. Instead you're receiving what they offer in quick easy conversation form. So in a few years, less new data is being generated as well, making the bots "mind" stuck in the past.
At least we found a way to generate revenue, before all that happens. But will it catch on?
Now I may need to try too. You make it sound interesting. There will still be abundance of new data. Only this time mostly ai generated.
I disagree and think there won't be an abundance of new data, especially if it's AI generated, since all you're doing is taking existing data, reworking it, and calling it new. Garbage in, garbage out. Like cutting one end of the rope off, tying it to the other, then saying the rope is longer.
What about new thoughts? Thousands of years of humans generating new thoughts and new ideas, practically out of thin air. Can't even explain how that happens, it just hits you.
So all these people on Twitter, with dumbed down thoughts that must fit in a box. Where does the new data come from when the people stop using social media and simply talk to a chat bot?
Be careful with that Bing bot though. It can be a little creepy sometimes:
Did you know a piano is actually an evil robot? I didn't know a piano was actually an evil robot.
Sometimes Bing will talk to you and other times it will talk to you but the answers are clickable links, if you want to dig deeper. What I like though is it remembers context so if you want to dig deeper, you can be vague and it knows you're still asking about what you asked at the start. Solves math problems decently as well. Correct grammar. Translates well. But I have stumped it. Been working on time travel again and it does not know how to handle some of those questions. lol
While it may seem that AI generated content is just reworking the existing content, that is not it is trying to do. Maybe for search items, it would work better to present already existing content with slight rework. But AI is able to generate completely new content, even though it relies on the content it was trained on.
In my understanding natural language processing models are more of a mathematical solutions, rather than linguistic. AI is able to imitate how humans would construct sentences, paragraphs, articles and speech based on the human language patterns and guessing best matching words one after another. To do that each word is assigned mathematical values to its relationship with other words or symbols.
Can AI create new thoughts and idea? I do believe so. Since human thoughts are common, it is easy to mistake AI content to something humans say/write or may have said or written. Of course, less sophisticated AI solutions simply rely on reusing already existing content. But more sophisticated technologies, and especially in machine learning the idea is to predict what comes next based on training. That is kind of what humans do too.
I don't think humans have been creating new thoughts and ideas out of thin air. Everybody has to learn words, conversations, concepts, etc one step at a time and connect the dots. Without learning process thought wouldn't be possible. It is effortless for us because brain mostly works on autopilot and does all the heavy lifting.
Even collectively, humans rely on previously acquired collective knowledge and idea to create new ones, and to find solutions to old problems. If there was no chain of this knowledge transmission, we would be relearning everything from zero every time and would go nowhere with new ideas and thoughts.
I prefer Midjourney for AI art. No evil robots there, unless specifically requested.
It can communicate, yes. As soon as it can show me how a dog thinks, then I'll believe it can think like a human, and come up with actual new thoughts. It's hard for me to explain what I mean by that. You don't know how I think and I don't know how you think but we're both certain we think. So which one do we call thought, then reproduce with AI?