I think there is a passage here that hits the nail on the head. Many speak out against the banning of crypto through force but rejoice and endorse the forceful application of it.

This is nothing new and can be found right across the globe simply replace Bitcoin for sugar, tea and even windows back in the day in England (I'd suggest reading about the window tax)

Unfortunately the dominant side always wins and then when they do they use force. If we look at Australia that has had crypto legal and the ability to use it as a currency to purchase items no one has taken it up.

Infact businesses are developing services for markets abroad.

Crypto or real world, there is no difference.