It's for the same reason that tribal posts generally offer more rewards when they are published from their respective tribal front-ends: It's to incentivize use of the front-end. It's not just an InLeo thing, but only InLeo has LeoAds revenue.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
You can only impose reward cuts paid from LeoAds, not the whole author rewards. Usually, I see curators of InLeo don't even look into posts published via other frontends, then why so worry. Bring natural traffic, don't be cruel on users stakes in InLeo as LPs.
No, INLEO can impose whatever they want on the LEO rewards they are paying.
By only paying LEO rewards to content that they can monetise, INLEO are not being "cruel"... jesus.
They are actually ensuring the long term sustainability of the token.
I can't understand why Ad Revenue is linked to curation rewards, possibly they want to increase page views, but it will impact users stopping inleo tag and that is for some reason is unnecessary for them as inleo shows all content even without tag.
They can do whatever they like its their baby and but have they asked their users what will they feel about it, like a survey or poll?
Bro, just don't take it personally, I am just discussing the reason behind the decision and I personally am optimistic about the company. If you find anything hurting, it is just a discussion.