That'll hurt users who use inleo or leofinance tags. What is the reason for this measure? It's like centralization of inleo!
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
That'll hurt users who use inleo or leofinance tags. What is the reason for this measure? It's like centralization of inleo!
It's for the same reason that tribal posts generally offer more rewards when they are published from their respective tribal front-ends: It's to incentivize use of the front-end. It's not just an InLeo thing, but only InLeo has LeoAds revenue.
You can only impose reward cuts paid from LeoAds, not the whole author rewards. Usually, I see curators of InLeo don't even look into posts published via other frontends, then why so worry. Bring natural traffic, don't be cruel on users stakes in InLeo as LPs.
No, INLEO can impose whatever they want on the LEO rewards they are paying.
By only paying LEO rewards to content that they can monetise, INLEO are not being "cruel"... jesus.
They are actually ensuring the long term sustainability of the token.
I can't understand why Ad Revenue is linked to curation rewards, possibly they want to increase page views, but it will impact users stopping inleo tag and that is for some reason is unnecessary for them as inleo shows all content even without tag.
They can do whatever they like its their baby and but have they asked their users what will they feel about it, like a survey or poll?
Bro, just don't take it personally, I am just discussing the reason behind the decision and I personally am optimistic about the company. If you find anything hurting, it is just a discussion.
Would McDonalds pay the staff to work their shift at KFC?
That's a blunt comparison, I wouldn't except such answer from a person who knows Hive's fundamentals well.
Well, we are stakeholders not staff of InLeo, if you are staff of InLeo you can expect such thing. It maybe good for a short time, but it would not help in a long run.
Isn't it just common sense for INLEO to only give the token they're printing in exchange for content that they can monetise on inleo.io?
Revenue that is then used to buy tokens off the market?
I don't understand how this is in any way shape or form a controversial action from the company haha.
That's a better explanation and good use of words. I discuss this constructively rather criticizing, but even constructive criticism is very important, if you take it that way.
I have been here for quite a time and you've been from the beginning of Hive, but I just say when talking to new user try to tell them positively rather inciting language.
If this is a business decision, no worries, things do happen, but they should listen to what other stakeholders will feel like in this case consumers of inleo.
centralization how? Lol
Things done without stakeholders approvals and hold the rewards they earn forcefully.
I'm sorry, but you don't understand INELO as a company and LEO as a token.
I would really encourage you to learn what you are getting yourself into before investing any further.
Thanks for the suggestions, anyway.
well, inleo isn't a DAO and LEO isn't a governance token.
inleo is a business.
True, but InLeo's vision intor tells that it is "For creators by Creators".