It’s sad that people feel the need to police in that way. Policing can be good but it can be just as bad (even worse) for the Hive blockchain when it’s overdone, communication about why/when/how, etc. are poor.
It seems an end user thought I used the leo.voter account to upvote the post.
Can confirm that I have sole access to curation via leo.voter and when I upvoted your post it was to front-page it on the hive blockchain.
Downvote pictures of flowers getting $10. Don’t downvote the newest team member of the #1 ranked community on the entire chain. 🤦🏽♀️ If stuff like this continues, let me know and we can take action. Downvote wars are so pointless
Thanks for doing these WU! I had fun reading through the responses on the last one and look forward to what we find in this one 🦁
Posted Using LeoFinance Mobile
No one wins with downvotes. Maybe people should focus on what they bring to the table, you know?
I actually think downvotes and curation are important, but when a group of people decide it is their job and spend hours a day in a chatroom talking about who to downvote and why... and are using community funds, they should stick to clearly defined guidelines and their stated purpose, which isn't to pick winners it's to fight abuse and plagiarism.
The problem comes when they decide to use that "antiabuse" stake for personal disagreement.
If they want to do that, get their own damn stake.
Well stated.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
Thanks Khal!
Onward and Upward!
I rarely see flower photo posts, which get $10, but still.
Why downvote it, if the content is original and quality?
Some people spend a lot of money on their photo equipment, and they also often spend a lot of time to take photos. Sometimes they even edit their photos. They deserve the rewards. $10 is not that big anyway. The half of that will go to the curators, and the author will get only $5.
Good points. Since it's not my thing, I can't imagine surfing pictures of flowers, but I am sure people do!
:)
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta